© Numismatica Ars Classica NAC AG
Decadrachm 264 BC - 241 BC
Silver | 37.80 g | - |
Issuer | Uncertain Siculo-Punic mint (Punic Sicily) |
---|---|
Type | Standard circulation coin |
Years | 264 BC - 241 BC |
Value | Decadrachm (5) |
Currency | Shekel |
Composition | Silver |
Weight | 37.80 g |
Shape | Round (irregular) |
Technique | Hammered |
Orientation | Variable alignment ↺ |
Demonetized | Yes |
Updated | 2024-10-09 |
Numista | N#194299 |
---|---|
Rarity index | 94% |
Reverse
Pegasus flying right. Below, B'RST in Punic characters.
Translation: In the land
Comment
Struck in the earliest phase of the First Punic War (264-241 B.C.), this issue represents a strict departure from earlier Punic coinages in Sicily. The bulk of the earlier types were struck to the Greek Attic weight standard, whereas this coin employs the Punic weight standard, being five of its shekels. Their style and fabric are markedly different than that of earlier types. The Pegasus must have been derived from Corinthian-type staters of the Syracusan King Agathocles (317-289 B.C.), yet the head of the goddess is inarguably Tanit, rather than a modified Artemis-Arethusa. Most importantly, the designs are engraved in a somewhat abstract style that is uniquely Carthaginian.Jenkins translates the Punic legend "B'RST" as meaning 'in the land' or 'in the territories,' noting that it might suggest an effort by Carthage to stake its claim as a rightful occupant of Sicily over the Romans, who were newcomers. He also suggests that these coins were minted in Sicily on the basis of hoard evidence, the inscription, and, perhaps most persuasively, the die axes, which are irregular on these five-shekel pieces and their related issues. By comparison, the much larger and more enduring series of coins assigned to Carthage are struck with the upright die alignment of a 'medal turn.' (source: Numismatica Ars Classica , Auction 66 Catalog)
Examples of this type:
• Example #1 (37.80g; About Extremely Fine):
© Image courtesy of Numismatica Ars Classica NAC AG
◦ Auctioned by Numismatica Ars Classica, Auction 66, 17 October 2012, Lot 24. Sold for 140,000 CHF.
◦ Auctioned by Hess-Leu 28, 1965, 120;
◦ Auctioned by Sotheby's 4 December 1990, Hunt part III, 49, sales.
• Example #2 (38.04g; Good Extremely Fine):
© Image courtesy of Numismatica Ars Classica NAC AG
◦ Ex-A.D.M. collection.
◦ Auctioned by Numismatica Ars Classica, Auction 114, 6 May 2019, Lot 109. Sold for 160,000 CHF.
◦ Auctioned by NAC 9, 1996, 290;
◦ Auctioned by Leu 83, 2002, 129 sales.
• Example #3 (37.95g; Extremely Fine):
© Image courtesy of Chaponnière et Firmenich SA
◦ Auctioned by Chaponnière & Firmenich SA, Auction 8, 5 July 2017, Lot 22. Sold for 90,000 CHF.
◦ Auctioned by Lanz auction 54, 12 november 1990, lot 358.
Interesting fact
One interesting fact about the Decadrachm coin from Uncertain Siculo-Punic mint is that it features a unique blend of Greek and Carthaginian influences in its design. The obverse side of the coin depicts a classical Greek profile of the goddess Arethusa, while the reverse side features a Phoenician inscription and a representation of the Carthaginian goddess Tanit. This fusion of styles reflects the cultural exchange and blending that occurred in Sicily during the Hellenistic period, when Greek and Carthaginian civilizations coexisted and influenced each other.