42 Nummi (Countermark; As of Agrippa, 45-12BC, honoured by Caligula, 37-41) (501-553) front 42 Nummi (Countermark; As of Agrippa, 45-12BC, honoured by Caligula, 37-41) (501-553) back
42 Nummi (Countermark; As of Agrippa, 45-12BC, honoured by Caligula, 37-41) (501-553) photo
© Classical Numismatic Group, Inc.

42 Nummi Countermark; As of Agrippa, 45-12BC, honoured by Caligula,

 
Bronze 9.95 g 27 mm
Description
Issuer
Ostrogothic Kingdom
Type
Standard circulation coin
Years
501-553
Value
42 Nummi = 1⁄12 Siliqua = 1⁄96 Tremissis
Currency
Tremissis (490-553)
Composition
Bronze
Weight
9.95 g
Diameter
27 mm
Shape
Round (irregular)
Technique
Hammered, Countermarked
Demonetized
Yes
Updated
2024-10-10
References
Numista
N#166647
Rarity index
91%

Reverse

Neptune standing with letter on either side.

Script: Latin

Lettering: S - C

Translation:
Senatus Consulto
By Decree of the Senate

Edge

Plain

Comment

These countermarked coins came in two denominations: 42 Nummi and 83 Nummi. While their values are quite odd in comparison to other Ostrogothic coins, these coins were not intended to be used as general nummus pieces, but rather fractions of the Siliqua (1/12 and 1/6 of one, respectively). While these denominations in nummi are not perfectly divisible by the equivalent values in siliquae, these values are as close to the proper divisions as possible.

The host coin for this piece is a Rome mint, 1 As struck under Agrippa (45-12 BC) honoured by Caligula (37-41), and these were said to be countermarked in the early- to mid-6th century. With the Ostrogothic Kingdom falling in 553, that is the latest possible end-date.

Around 150 countermarked coins are known, with the vast majority being found in Italy. Because the host coins were minted hundreds of years before the countermarks were applied, it is suggested that a hoard of these host coins were found, which prompted some local mint in Ostrogothic Italy to start countermarking them.

Interesting fact

One interesting fact about this coin is that it was issued during the reign of Caligula, who was known for his controversial and often tyrannical rule. Despite this, the coin still bears the image of Agrippa, who was a respected military leader and statesman, indicating that the coin was likely issued as a way to honor his legacy. Additionally, the fact that it was countermarked with the image of Caligula suggests that it was issued during a time of political upheaval, as the Ostrogothic Kingdom was likely trying to assert its independence from the Roman Empire.